A close knit relationship

It is a terrible feeling if someone leaves you.Is it?
Someone you love???
A`person is capable of loving only that person in which he worships his ideals,his values,thus,in turn in which he sees his reflection.There is no other way a person could love and be loved.Just this.And if no values exist for you,then u'll get attracted to another depraved person,an altruist or a person who believes in giving love to the unworthy(could be in any form).Your choice reflects you as a person in every aspect.The kind of people you be with reflects your ideals and not even a single contradiction must exist in such relationships.It is like a close knit circle.The members form the circle and ultimately meet up one another with the same ideals set in their minds;but if they fail to meet then their exists some depravity somewhere which must be excluded.So,if a person leaves you,it completely shows his lack of compatability with your ideals.After all he must be a reflection of your consciousness and being with you would only result in his act of lying to himself,which in turn would destroy him eventually.When happiness is the sole purpose of life then why would he repudiate his own happiness by being with such a person.So the best option is to leave that person.And this must be accepted with great understanding on both the sides.I think it's a wonderful feeling if 'such a being' leaves you.It is terrible for only those who have no ethics set in their lives,those who are incapable of thinking and if someone 'like this' leaves them then they reach upto a level of taking revenge.
But,yes I think it is very important for two such people to clarify all this in between themselves.It is a must requirement and people who are capable of thinking would definitely understand such a state in their relationship.At times,although it is of no use trying to tell all this to unthinkables.They say-'How does it matter the kind of people you be with'.They could never understand this.So just leave them without any explanations.They would feel terrible for the first few months but later on would develop such hard feelings against that person and would try their level best to prove him wrong.It is is such an amusing gesture!
But,if someone whose ideals match with you and leaves you then believe me at some point of time they'll again come together.Such people are capable of loving each other so much that at some phase of life that love develops into reverence.They deny 'it' to each other due the very thought that they need someone in their lives(totally unbeareable to them),but ultimately fail to do so and end up being with each other.
One case,for which no forgiveness is ever possible is when the person 'pretends' to understand your ideals,'pretends' to support your every thought with his own thoughts,never denies anything but ultimately ends up following none of them.Sooner or later his actions betray his intentions.His contradictions act as a limelight and justify his actions.Finally the consequence is always separation,but mind you it hurts a lot for the only reason that at one point of time you end up giving your ego to him.All others are forgivable but these.
For me,this is the only way relationships should be held,a rare sight,yet it is there.

Likes attract and unlikes repell each other

No two objects are ever exactly alike.For if two objects resembled each other completely in every form and structure,there could not possible be any evidence for believing there were two of them.Now when I refer to objects it implies 'inanimate objects' only and I have excluded the part 'individuals' out of it.By an inanimate object I simply mean 'not capable of thinking'.The rest regarding its lack of response,mobility etc all together means nothing to me.The only criteria by which I present my ontology and recognise the difference in between an inanimate object and an individual is by judging the being's thinking process.
For example:
1) A:an object:immobile;unresponsive;cannot think
Hence A must be inanimate
2)B:a being,mobile;responsive(cries and laughs);cannot think(doesn't want to)
Hence B must be inanimate
3)C:a being;thinks
Hence C must be an individual

Now,I'll explain my next concept
Lets suppose two individuals X and Y and their relation to each other
Theory 1)
X:loves white color
Y:loves black color
X:loves playing tennis
Y:loves playing football
X:loves fox
Y:loves dogs
X:loves singing
Y:loves singing
X and Y:hate dancing
I could probably continue more too but I would rather explain the relationship from these very facts only
The above mentioned likes and dislikes are irrational 'superficial attractions'.These may or may not be mentioned at all ever in a relationship.

Theory 2a)
X has no values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life.
Y has no values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life.
Now if I link X and Y it would be like linking B and B
Relationship status:everlasting(superficial attractions work along very well for these two 'inanimates';their conversations are always about 'family relationships','friends','past lovers','likes and dislikes'.)

Theory 2b)
X has no values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life.
Y has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life which mean a lot to her;probably as much as she could sacrifice her life if at any point of time start contradicting her ownviews.
Now if I link X with Y it would be like linking B and C
Relationship status:break

Theory 2c)
X has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life which mean a lot to him;probably as much as he could sacrifice his life if at any point of time start contradicting his ownviews(X's views contradict Y's views)
Y has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life which mean a lot to her;probably as much as she could sacrifice her life if at any point of time start contradicting her ownviews(Y's views contradict X's views)
Now if I link X and Y it would be like linking C and C
Relationship status:break
P.S. I have never understood unlikes attract and likes repell each other [probably quite valid for 'inanimates' of theory 2a)]

Theory 2d)
X has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life which mean a lot to him;probably as much as he could sacrifice his life if at any point of time start contradicting his ownviews(X's views do not contradict Y's views)
Y has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life which mean a lot to her;probably as much as she could sacrifice her life if at any point of time start contradicting her ownviews(Y's views do not contradict X's views)
Now if I link X and Y it would be like linking C and C
Relationship status:everlasting
P.S.likes attract and unlikes repell each other

My comradeship towards the kind of people I want in my life has one supreme demand - they must learn to be themselves when they are with anyone around them(mostly people change their viewpoints with the kind of people they be with - so I tag them 'chamaeleons').This is possible only if they realize the importance of 'I' in their lives.They must hold their happiness as a supremacy over anyone elses' happiness,that they must live for themselves only.But the kind of people I usually meet take into account the entire viewpoint of others objectives before they express their views to them.They have this intimidating fear of the other person getting hurt by their straightforward hard viewpoints.So as to prevent the other person from entering into any kind of abomination,they sincerely disguise their true feelings and enter into a hypocoristic world.There are few others who do this to appease others,practicing their complaisant behaviour without thinking.It's like being blinded by the light,but mind u it is very temporary.This kind of fakeness can never last long.Such people possess nothing,,no consciousness.So sooner or later their actions betray their intentions.Their contradictions act as a limelight and justify their actions.

MY POWER-KILL THEMSELVES

The world of stance

I name them so

'Cowards'they shout

'Cowards'they call them

The mind of stance

Capable of thinking

Only one way

A root cause,they name it

Non courageous,

Fleeing from their problems,

Disgrace so unbearable;

So comes the reason

The world of stance preach,

The world of 'My power'

Kill themselves.

The world of 'My power'

Make this one mistake;

'Work recognition'

So they want

The world of stance

Suffocating my power

In their hands

The importance of work

My power holds,

The creations

My power make;

Acceptance,they demand

Admiration they flee

But aah!beg

Understanding

A right meaning

To their work

The world of stance

In control of my powers'

Time and patience

Make them lose

The world of 'My power'

Kill themselves.

Every person has his own way to believe in things.Although nowadays it's more like a crowd attracting more of it.People blindly follow things they could never understand.They seem to flow with the pace.Individualism is almost lost and blindness has strenghthened its position.
WHAT IS GOD TO ME
In this world the word god is used for such an entity which we place most highly in our minds.Something we pay our full reverence to,something whose position is considered most sacred.But,if I give that position to someone whose identity I am totally unaware of,whose statues and shrines I build just according to those creative innovations of my mind,then I just fail to justify the entire definition of god.So to me,god is the work where my mind is applied,the way I think,the way my conscience makes me live my life and most importantly the things and people I believe in.
I won't say that whatever I do is always as equal as god to me,but I could give my life for it to be otherwise.

The two extremes
I ravel my mind into
The first one with a fogged picture
Set into the mind
A pseudo hole filled with the so called
Confidence
The appreciating world
Strengthening the demeanor
Making him move around
Capturing his mind in their own
A parasite he becomes
A selfless life he lives
Like a kite he flies so high
And then there comes another thudder
The mirror cracks
The broken pieces disappear
But the rest left appears like another hole
Filled of blood.
The second one,they say
So humble,so meek
So selfless,so true
He lives for the world
Such complascency he lives with
Such charity he does
Such guilt he parts off
And so is loved by all
But him
God,so call him