No two objects are ever exactly alike.For if two objects resembled each other completely in every form and structure,there could not possible be any evidence for believing there were two of them.Now when I refer to objects it implies 'inanimate objects' only and I have excluded the part 'individuals' out of it.By an inanimate object I simply mean 'not capable of thinking'.The rest regarding its lack of response,mobility etc all together means nothing to me.The only criteria by which I present my ontology and recognise the difference in between an inanimate object and an individual is by judging the being's thinking process.
For example:
1) A:an object:immobile;unresponsive;cannot think
Hence A must be inanimate
2)B:a being,mobile;responsive(cries and laughs);cannot think(doesn't want to)
Hence B must be inanimate
3)C:a being;thinks
Hence C must be an individual
Now,I'll explain my next concept
Lets suppose two individuals X and Y and their relation to each other
Theory 1)
X:loves white color
Y:loves black color
X:loves playing tennis
Y:loves playing football
X:loves fox
Y:loves dogs
X:loves singing
Y:loves singing
X and Y:hate dancing
I could probably continue more too but I would rather explain the relationship from these very facts only
The above mentioned likes and dislikes are irrational 'superficial attractions'.These may or may not be mentioned at all ever in a relationship.
Theory 2a)
X has no values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life.
Y has no values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life.
Now if I link X and Y it would be like linking B and B
Relationship status:everlasting(superficial attractions work along very well for these two 'inanimates';their conversations are always about 'family relationships','friends','past lovers','likes and dislikes'.)
Theory 2b)
X has no values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life.
Y has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life which mean a lot to her;probably as much as she could sacrifice her life if at any point of time start contradicting her ownviews.
Now if I link X with Y it would be like linking B and C
Relationship status:break
Theory 2c)
X has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life which mean a lot to him;probably as much as he could sacrifice his life if at any point of time start contradicting his ownviews(X's views contradict Y's views)
Y has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life which mean a lot to her;probably as much as she could sacrifice her life if at any point of time start contradicting her ownviews(Y's views contradict X's views)
Now if I link X and Y it would be like linking C and C
Relationship status:break
P.S. I have never understood unlikes attract and likes repell each other [probably quite valid for 'inanimates' of theory 2a)]
Theory 2d)
X has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in his life which mean a lot to him;probably as much as he could sacrifice his life if at any point of time start contradicting his ownviews(X's views do not contradict Y's views)
Y has certain values,standards,ethics and judgements in her life which mean a lot to her;probably as much as she could sacrifice her life if at any point of time start contradicting her ownviews(Y's views do not contradict X's views)
Now if I link X and Y it would be like linking C and C
Relationship status:everlasting
P.S.likes attract and unlikes repell each other
Friday, March 27, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
My comradeship towards the kind of people I want in my life has one supreme demand - they must learn to be themselves when they are with anyone around them(mostly people change their viewpoints with the kind of people they be with - so I tag them 'chamaeleons').This is possible only if they realize the importance of 'I' in their lives.They must hold their happiness as a supremacy over anyone elses' happiness,that they must live for themselves only.But the kind of people I usually meet take into account the entire viewpoint of others objectives before they express their views to them.They have this intimidating fear of the other person getting hurt by their straightforward hard viewpoints.So as to prevent the other person from entering into any kind of abomination,they sincerely disguise their true feelings and enter into a hypocoristic world.There are few others who do this to appease others,practicing their complaisant behaviour without thinking.It's like being blinded by the light,but mind u it is very temporary.This kind of fakeness can never last long.Such people possess nothing,,no consciousness.So sooner or later their actions betray their intentions.Their contradictions act as a limelight and justify their actions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
